📣 Delivered. Opened. Tracked. 🗓️ Sent: July 15, 2025 📎 Attachments:

Final Complaint – Dorn v. UnitedHealthcare

Unbranded “Surveillance by Proxy” Dossier 📍 Delivered to: UnitedHealthcare and Rocky Mountain Health Plans 🕵️ Tracked Page Views (First 5 Minutes): 22 🌍 Unique Visitors After Delivery: 42 🕒 Real-Time Access Confirmed From:

Grand Junction

Denver

San Jose, CA

Unknown (Internal Routing)

I told them:

“I saw your team on the website.”

Then I delivered everything:

The final 413-paragraph complaint

The metadata logs

The unbranded exposé

And a firm deadline: August 8, 2025 – 11:59 p.m. MST

Since then:

42 first-time users accessed this site

22 pages were viewed in under 5 minutes

Two users in San Jose—far from Colorado—dug through the material

Then the map… went quiet again

They know what’s coming. They’ve opened it. And now they’re watching silently, hoping the rest of the world doesn’t.

🧨 The Clock Is Ticking. They have 24 days to respond. The media rollout is already scheduled. And the story no longer belongs to them.

🔗 AdministrativeErasure.org This record is timestamped. This delivery is verifiable. This silence is strategic.

We Know What You’re Looking At Nine views. Three agents. You didn’t just look. You filtered by category. You followed the whistle. You confirmed the metadata.

And now? So have we.

2. Metadata Log Public Entry (timestamped): July 15, 2025 – 5:12 PM MST Real-time analytics confirm direct access to: Complaint, Exhibit Z, Exhibit AA, I See You, and Legal Commentary Simulation by users navigating from UnitedHealthcare-linked correspondence. Logs archived.

3. Backend Entry in Complaint or Motion: “Defendants and/or their agents confirmed receipt and active review of public documentation by no later than July 15, 2025 at 5:12 p.m. MST, including whistleblower exhibit (AA), surveillance exposé (Z), and formal complaint structure. Continued denial after this timestamp may constitute bad-faith litigation posture.”

Attention UHC, i see you.....

Two users. Four spikes. Thirty minutes. Right after I emailed you the link.

You opened the site. You read the complaint. You confirmed it was real.

So let’s not pretend you haven’t seen it. Let’s not pretend you don’t know what this is.

The metadata doesn’t lie. The disclosure happened. The timeline is intact. And the public is watching now too.

🕳️ You looked into the abyss. Welcome to the Administrative Erasure record.

You didn’t just view the homepage. You clicked Exhibit AA. You scanned court filings. You read the warning.

Metadata never lies. Erasure isn’t a concept. It’s a process. And now it’s logged. and there is more, im just watching you watch me. Quid Pro Quo

There was a moment—one I can pinpoint with surgical clarity—where I realized they weren’t just trying to deny me care.

They were trying to disappear me!

The surveillance. The metadata. The disclosure. Not because I broke a law. Not because I posed a danger. But because I became inconvenient.

My name didn’t raise a red flag. My identity did.

UnitedHealthcare had no legal reason to send my personal medical information to police.

There was no warrant. No subpoena. No imminent danger. Just a phone call where I dared to assert my rights. Just a timeline that challenged their narrative. Just a trans woman on Medicaid who refused to be silent.

So they flipped the script. And they framed me.

Not as a person.

But as a potential threat.

And that is what happens when corporate systems are allowed to function like state intelligence. This wasn’t about safety. It was about containment. It was about eliminating the variables they couldn’t control.

It didn’t matter what I actually said. It didn’t matter that I followed the law. They labeled me unstable. Flagged me as risky. And then quietly delivered that label to the Grand Junction Police Department.

That is administrative erasure.

They didn’t kick down my door. They didn’t need to. Because when a bureaucratic label says "dangerous," you don’t need to be dangerous. You just need to be documented.

The day I felt so small was the day I felt like Luigi.

Not Mario. Not the hero. Not the face on the box.

Just the afterthought. The sidekick. The shadow.

That’s what it felt like when they erased me. When my voice was stripped of context. When my medical records were weaponized. When I was framed not as a person—but as a potential threat.

Luigi never asked to be second. He just wanted to exist. To matter. To be seen.

And that’s all I ever wanted, too.

So I built something they can’t erase.

AdministrativeErasure.org

If you want to see what they tried to bury, look here: https://www.administrativeerasure.org/2025/07/the-35-day-myth-of-imminent-threat

This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a paper trail.

And it ends with a truth they can’t control.

Abstract

In an era of predictive policing, algorithmic triage, and privatized surveillance, a dangerous new frontier of civil rights abuse has emerged: administrative erasure.

This exposé outlines how UnitedHealthcare weaponized metadata and indirect police collaboration to erase the voice, safety, and medical autonomy of a transgender patient who dared to speak up.

Drawing from whistleblower disclosures, metadata forensics, and internal voice profiling records, this PDF reveals how denial was institutionalized—and how bureaucracies are being retooled as engines of digital repression.

⚠️ This is not hypothetical. ⚖️ This is happening now. 📎 Download the full exposé below.

Call to Action: 📄 Download PDF Administrative Erasure – Why Every American Should Pay Attention

I Was Supposed to Stay Quiet. I Didn't. They thought I would disappear. They counted on silence. On shame. On exhaustion.

But here I am. And here’s the truth:

You don’t get to erase people and expect them not to respond.

What comes next isn’t noise. It’s resistance—with receipts

This isn’t a warning. It’s a reckoning. And I’m not just here to speak—I’m here to be heard.

They called it a “welfare check.”

But I wasn’t missing. I wasn’t a danger to myself. I wasn’t having a mental health emergency. I was a transgender Medicaid recipient who had spoken too clearly, asked too many questions, and reached the end of what the system could tolerate. That’s when the silence began—not a bureaucratic oversight, but a calculated refusal. And that’s when the data started to move.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory. This isn’t speculation. This is a lived account of what happens when institutional power meets metadata profiling, and healthcare denial becomes a surveillance protocol.

What Happened?

This site shares my first-person narrative—because no lawsuit, no headline, and no corporate statement will ever fully convey what it means to be erased while still alive.

• I was denied medically necessary care that had already been approved.
• I was then framed as a potential threat based on private health information.
• That information, protected under HIPAA, was passed to law enforcement.
• There was no emergency. No warrant. No court order.
• There was only a transgender woman alone in her home—suddenly surrounded by armed officers.

Why Tell This Story?

Because I survived it.
Because others might not.
Because “administrative erasure” is not a metaphor—it’s a method.
And because the people responsible will never admit what they’ve done unless the truth is louder than their silence.

I’m not here to shame individuals. I’m here to expose a systemic pattern: when someone like me becomes inconvenient, the system withdraws care and escalates control. That’s not medicine. That’s profiling with a clinical face.

What You’ll Find in This Archive

• Redacted but verifiable evidence that aligns with the public record
• A survivor’s voice preserved on her own terms
• Legal filings that document the breach, the silence, and the aftermath
• Whistleblower disclosures and internal metadata patterns
• A reconstruction of what they tried to make disappear

This is not about revenge.
It’s about documentation.
It’s about survival.
And this is not a story they wanted told.

But I’m telling it anyway.